progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
Nate Silver interviews an anti-Obama documentary maker. It’s a strange and hostile interview, especially given that the anti-Obama guy requested the interview. You gotta love this:
NS: Would you consider yourself well-informed
JZ: I’d consider myself extremely well-informed.NS: Who are the two senators from South Dakota
JZ: Thune and, uh, Johnson.NS: Very good. South Carolina?
JZ: Go fuck yourself. I’m done with this interview if you’re going to ask me stupid questions like that. Obviously I know who Lindsay Graham is.NS: Well, since you’re running a website calling people misinformed, I’d like to see if — there are certain things you’ve said that I would consider misinformed.
JZ: Misinformed? You’re a piece of work! You are never going to have the guts to post a representative transcript on your website! I thought you actually ran a legitimate website!NS: Thank you, have a good day.
JZ: Go fuck yourself.
JZ reminds me a bit of the PUMAs. In particular, the radio show described here. The similarity is that both believe they have some special and heretofore hidden knowledge, and that once this knowledge is revealed, they that can hear will rise up. And there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth. Oh, and they’re thin-skinned.
—————————————————————————————
In other news, things on the whole appear to be going quite well in the Obama transition. I was reading Dan Froomkin’s column, and noted the uniformly unmixed approval for Eric Holder, Obama’s pick for AG. I think it’s interesting to note that PUMA Lite has been writing about how awful this and that person is on the Obama transition team. When it comes to an appointment that would critically align with progressive ideals, the Correntians are silent. Is their aim as a blog to discuss why they hate Obama for the next 4 years?
I’m glad to see that DCblogger got Katie Robbins of HealthCare Now lined up for a live blog this Sunday at 5. It’s efforts like this that move the discussion forward. And, hey I might steal her as a guest.
Meanwhile, I got Mark Benjamin from Salon.com lined up for Dec 4 at DL. Among other things I hope to talk about his article on prosecuting torture in the Obama administration.
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
[Link]
[Link]
On a muggy Florida evening in 2008, I meet Iraq War veteran Forrest Fogarty in the Winghouse, a little bar-restaurant on the outskirts of Tampa, his favorite hangout. [Link]
The Labor Department announced this morning that new applications for jobless benefits rose to a seasonally adjusted 542,000 last week. It also revised the figure from the previous week down to 515,000. [Link]
A team from IBM has spent the past several years constructing a virtual-world version of China's Forbidden City. [Link]
Following confirmation that Google intends to open its virtual world Lively to games developers, creative director Kevin Hanna has revealed the long-term goal is for the service to become an online games platform. [Link]
CHIBA, Japan (AP) -- Video game rivals Sony and Microsoft are going head-to-head in virtual worlds for their home consoles later this year. [Link]
a) He was paid by Dick Cheney's henchwoman Mary Matalin to write a book on Obama [Link]
One bunch of guys is getting up and saying, "we hafta." Another bunch of guys is getting up and saying, "nuh-uh." [Link]
To be able to say to folks, "You can keep what you have" is a big political selling point. [Link]
Here, based on 16 years experience watching Bill Clinton campaign — and interviews with a half-dozen veterans of his political teams — is a reasonably safe bet about his campaign advice to Barack Obama: [Link]
WASHINGTON — Government officials handling billions of dollars in oil royalties improperly engaged in sex with employees of energy companies they were dealing with and received numerous gifts from them, federal investigators said Wednesday. [Link]
We are going to have a new administration. Do we want these policies continued or not? [Link]
You can try Counter Culture coffees at: - Baked and Wired, 1052 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, 202-333-2500; www.bakedandwired.com [Link]
In sum, we concluded that the evidence showed that Goodling violated both federal law and Department policy, and therefore committed misconduct... [Link]
27 queries. 0.605 seconds
November 19th, 2008 at 7:43 pm
In response:
http://www.correntewire.com/content/im-blogging-fast-i-can
November 20th, 2008 at 12:28 am
Thanks, I’m glad you posted.
November 20th, 2008 at 2:05 am
BTW, I was planning to post something to that effect about Holder regardless of your concern over the lack of such a post, having read Glenn’s post in the afternoon and finding it encouraging and worth blogging about.
However, I was busy responding to an accusation from one of those “better bloggers,” to the effect that I copulate with crickets.
November 20th, 2008 at 2:46 am
“I was planning to post something to that effect about Holder regardless of your concern over the lack of such a post, having read Glenn’s post in the afternoon and finding it encouraging and worth blogging about.”
Glenn has raised all of our consciences on these issues. I find myself continually amazed at what I’ve missed when I read his salon blog.
I do believe you need to take the measure on what you’ve written thus far concerning the Obama presidency. You’ve been pretty negative. I question whether your criticism is deserved
November 20th, 2008 at 3:17 am
Unlike “better bloggers,” I don’t make a habit of telling other bloggers what they “need to” do.
Though you don’t “need to,” you might reconsider offering STFU to progressives who — after, for example, the woeful performance of the 110th Congress — are properly skeptical about the Democratic Party’s performance and intentions.
All this pearl-clutching about harshing the mellow. Are we all Sally Quinn now?
For two years, I looked very closely at Obama’s campaign (and pre-campaign) and found much of it disconcerting, beginning with his fundamental way of framing the state of the nation.
The story of America under Bush is, obviously, as follows:
* The corrupt, authoritarian Republican Party espoused and enacted a literally bankrupt agenda, and more than enough Democrats went along with it so they ran roughshod over our nation and its Constitution almost completely unimpeded.
Obama’s frame is:
* The problems in Washington are caused by a partisan food-fight.
There is only one hopeful explanation for this.
Thus, it is with skepticism that I await signs that the new administration will provide the kind of progressive reforms that we need and that the country is (or could be made) ready for.
When Obama does right by progressives and progressive issues, I’ll say so and happily. I’m going to hope and cajole for the best, but I’m not required to believe that the best will happen… especially if we go around biting our tongues rather than challenging Obama to stand and deliver.
Again, I direct you to Chris Bowers’s correct intepretation of where I’m coming from.
November 20th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
Indeed, you may not give advice, but you’re pretty quick to throw out things like: “All this pearl-clutching about harshing the mellow. Are we all Sally Quinn now?”
I get it. You’re not negative, I’m a pearl clutcher. That’s cool. At least you didn’t suggest I have sex with bugs. So that’s classy. And, you didn’t call me an Obot or infer that I’ve ingested a sweetened psychotropic beverage.
I read Chris Bowers piece. That’s not what I’m talking about. He’s talking about folks who are upset about any criticism of Obama. That’s hardly what you and others at Corrente have been involved in. If anything, you seem to have a hard time saying anything positive about Obama. Out of curiosity, when’s the last time you did say something positive about Obama?
November 20th, 2008 at 2:03 pm
IIRC, you took it upon yourself to write a couple of posts shaming Corrente for divisive incivility. So, going from zero to throwing-around seems more like your métier.
I’ll be sure to file regular reports with you about how many positive things I’ve written about Obama. Apparently the blogosphere isn’t producing enough. Plus, I’m a known heretic, and it’s for the best that I pass inspections from alert citizens to ensure I’ve engaged in appropriate and sufficient happy talk.
Of course, everyone’s telling us to reserve judgment because he hasn’t done anything yet (and I’m mostly agreeing), but why should that be a hindrance?
“Pearl clutcher” seems like an apt description of one who writes posts complaining about other bloggers’ incivility and their failure to write certain posts in a time-frame of your choosing. If you’d like to pretend that I’ve called you an “Obot” or “Kool-Aid” drinker, please don’t let reality stop you, since it would bolster your case.
Oh, and if I may, here are couple of arguments for staying off the fainting couch when some progressives seek to hold Obama’s feet to the fire…
Cornel West about Barack Obama: “I hope he is a progressive Lincoln, I aspire to be the Frederick Douglass to put pressure on him.”
FDR: “I agree with you, I want to do it, now make me do it.”
November 20th, 2008 at 2:48 pm
I’ll try to stay off the fainting couch. Thanks for playing!