progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
Please go read this article from NPR on Kurt Vonnegut, written by his son Mark. You can take any paragraph from the article and spend the rest of the afternoon pondering the truth contained therein.
At random, I’ll take this one:
He was like an extrovert who wanted to be an introvert, a very social guy who wanted to be a loner, a lucky person who would have preferred to be unlucky. An optimist posing as a pessimist, hoping people will take heed. It wasn’t until the Iraq War and the end of his life that he became sincerely gloomy.
Me, too, Kurt. Me, too. The Iraq War has sincerely depressed me for a variety of reasons. It’s impossible for me to reflect on Iraq without thinking about how many people are no longer with us. People that no doubt loved being alive just as much as I do, no longer walk the face of this strange and beautiful planet. That is very hard to accept. When you add to this that there was every reason to believe that the Iraq War wouldn’t accomplish anything, you have every right to be sincerely gloomy.
As I say, this is just one paragraph excerpted from Mark Vonnegut’s new book, Armageddon.
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
A team from IBM has spent the past several years constructing a virtual-world version of China's Forbidden City. [Link]
Following confirmation that Google intends to open its virtual world Lively to games developers, creative director Kevin Hanna has revealed the long-term goal is for the service to become an online games platform. [Link]
CHIBA, Japan (AP) -- Video game rivals Sony and Microsoft are going head-to-head in virtual worlds for their home consoles later this year. [Link]
a) He was paid by Dick Cheney's henchwoman Mary Matalin to write a book on Obama [Link]
One bunch of guys is getting up and saying, "we hafta." Another bunch of guys is getting up and saying, "nuh-uh." [Link]
To be able to say to folks, "You can keep what you have" is a big political selling point. [Link]
Here, based on 16 years experience watching Bill Clinton campaign — and interviews with a half-dozen veterans of his political teams — is a reasonably safe bet about his campaign advice to Barack Obama: [Link]
WASHINGTON — Government officials handling billions of dollars in oil royalties improperly engaged in sex with employees of energy companies they were dealing with and received numerous gifts from them, federal investigators said Wednesday. [Link]
We are going to have a new administration. Do we want these policies continued or not? [Link]
You can try Counter Culture coffees at: - Baked and Wired, 1052 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, 202-333-2500; www.bakedandwired.com [Link]
In sum, we concluded that the evidence showed that Goodling violated both federal law and Department policy, and therefore committed misconduct... [Link]
The best way to make sense of this legal tangle is to mouse over the title of an individual scandal, which will highlight everyone implicated. [Link]
A 22-year-old bicyclist was struck by a garbage truck and killed just north of Dupont Circle today, authorities said. Police and fire vehicles converged on the scene at 20th and R streets NW, snarling Connecticut Avenue traffic during the morning rush. [Link]
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
The report notes that the administration has gone to “unprecedented lengths to control and suppress information about the human cost” of the wars. [Link]
27 queries. 0.810 seconds
June 12th, 2008 at 1:28 pm
I didn’t get sincerely gloomy until I read the Shock Doctrine. The failure of John Edwards’ campaign was also crushing.
June 12th, 2008 at 10:52 pm
Yeah, the Edwards campaign hurt, or rather the ending of it.
I’m reading Shock Doctrine now. Great book, and I’m glad to hear you’ve read it. Of course, I mean “great” in a sincerely gloomy kind of way.
I’ve thought about trying to get Naomi Klein to talk at DL at some point. I met her briefly at TBA, and was very impressed.
June 16th, 2008 at 10:48 am
I have Shock Doctrine but haven’t read it. So what I’m about to say may be off the mark,
but I wonder about the thesis a little bit.
Consider the Great Depression. In that case, an economic crisis resulted in a great expansion
of government and a political realignment that has had largely liberal outcomes.
Of course I’m aware that some critics on the left see the New Deal and its successor policy regimes
as essentially corporatist in nature, done for the benefit of preserving capitalism. But still the
result has been the creation of programs that provide a range of benefits to working people.
How does Klein deal with this?
Meanwhile I should probably dig the book out and look at the index. But I haven’t thought about the
book for a while so in the mean time any thoughts would be appreciated.
June 16th, 2008 at 11:19 am
I would say you’re correct. It’s entirely possible that the reason that Depression era programs took hold, was of the same nature as programs put in place by the Bushies after 9.11.
One of the reasons that it’s important to have these evenings where authors come in is to task questions just like that.
One thing that may be different is the degree that “we” (meaning research psychologists) understood the response to traumatic situations and environments. I gather most of this research was post-WWII.