progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
One of the things that I look forward to is being able to focus on the right-wing freak show rather than the rhetorical fallacies of fellow progressives. But today and tomorrow we’ll probably see a few token shots at the “Obamabots.” For example, BTD takes this statement by Roger Simon out of context to inflame Clinton supporters:
It has been a hard-fought and sometimes bitter campaign, but Obama is not, one of his senior advisers assured me Tuesday night, going to spend a lot of time in the next few months wooing Clinton supporters whose feelings may be hurting.
Sounds like Roger Simon is saying that the Obama campaign told him that Clinton supporters would be thrown under the bus doesn’t it? But, the following paragraph makes clear that the Obama campaign staffer is saying that now the campaign pivots to focus on former Clinton supporters, independents, and Republicans: ( Politico )
“I think there are always immediate feelings of disappointment and anger,” Anita Dunn said. “But in the months ahead, he must appeal not just to the constituency groups who favored her in the primaries, but those he wants in the general election, and that includes independents and Republicans.”
Why would BTD quote the introductory remark without the context of the following paragraph? Interesting question. Here’s my theory. BTD understands that anger sells. He is providing what former supporters of Clinton are looking for: justification for their anger at Obama. Is the anger actually justified? Not from that quote it isn’t.
Any other theories?
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
You can try Counter Culture coffees at: - Baked and Wired, 1052 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, 202-333-2500; www.bakedandwired.com [Link]
In sum, we concluded that the evidence showed that Goodling violated both federal law and Department policy, and therefore committed misconduct... [Link]
The best way to make sense of this legal tangle is to mouse over the title of an individual scandal, which will highlight everyone implicated. [Link]
A 22-year-old bicyclist was struck by a garbage truck and killed just north of Dupont Circle today, authorities said. Police and fire vehicles converged on the scene at 20th and R streets NW, snarling Connecticut Avenue traffic during the morning rush. [Link]
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
The report notes that the administration has gone to “unprecedented lengths to control and suppress information about the human cost” of the wars. [Link]
"We see a tipping point occurring right before our eyes," Hansen said during his appearance at the National Press Club. "The Arctic is the first tipping point and it's occurring exactly the way we said it would." [Link]
It appeared to confirm for the first time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized during the Bush administration. [Link]
"After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be ans [Link]
It gives me a terrible mental image of the whole country linking arms and goose-stepping in unison, with the politicians out in front doing a straight-armed salute. [Link]
BOULTON: There are those who would say look, lets take Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Ghraib, and rendition and all those things and to them that is the complete opposite of freedom. BUSH: Of course, if you want to slander America. [Link]
In a subsequent e-mail to the employee, Cargol described himself as “a rub-your-belly, grab-your-balls, give-you-a-hug, slap-your-back, pull-your-dick, squeeze-your-hand, cheek-your-face, and pat-your-thigh kind of guy.” [Link]
Democracy Now! Radio and TV News [Link]
Let's take a look at how the Los Angeles Times covered the new Senate Intelligence Committee report on the claims made as part of selling the Iraq war, and compare it to how the editorial page of the Washington Post, by which I mean Fred Hiatt, sees the e [Link]
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that the Iraq war was sold to the American people with a sophisticated "political propaganda campaign" led by President Bush and aimed at "manipulating sources of public opinion" an [Link]
27 queries. 0.517 seconds
June 5th, 2008 at 10:55 am
I don’t get the Talk Left folks at all. I thought they were always a pretty liberal site,
and Obama is more reliably liberal than HRC. In contrast to Clinton, Obama has actually worked
to make the criminal justice system more just, from his days in Illinois,
which I would have thought the Talk Left folks would have particularly been drawn to.
And then of course there’s the matter of Hillary’s Iraq war vote and her vote on the bellicose
Iran resolution. So I don’t get it. Oh well.
June 5th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
I don’t get it, either. From talking to many in DL, The Seminal, DC for Democracy, etc., one of the mysteries is why Talk Left would sacrifice its reputation as an even-handed legal analysis blog, and go all Hillary, all the time.
I do hope some day to say to the folks there: “Welcome back to the fight. This time, I know our side will win.” ( lightly stolen from V. Laszlo. )
June 10th, 2008 at 12:07 pm
I’m trying to move on, too.
Although I still find myself acting like that character in Office Space,
who has to be restrained by his coworkers from taking one last swing of
the baseball bat at the obliterated fax machine. Then after convincing his
buddies he’s done swinging, they let go of him, and he lunges for the machine
again with bat in hand, as if remembering one more past insult that must be
accounted for.