progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
The Great Blog War of 2008 has not been a good season for the reality-based community. And, unnecessarily so. The fight between the Clinton and Obama camps could have been over substantive issues. Instead, the tenor of the discussion was just a tad better than out-and-out name-calling.
Still, I reserve a special place in hell for those who pretend to be applying analysis to one candidate or another, but in fact are just being hacky. By hacky in this case I really mean dishonest; attempting to mess with people’s minds.
To explain what I mean, I wanted to link to two posts. The first is clearly identifiable as opinion, the second appears to be analysis, but isn’t.
Eriposte: (I’m using key sentences from the post that serve to summarize the arguments)
Jerome: (again, using key sentences to summarize his points)
While I disagree with both Eriposte and Jerome, at least Eriposte stays well within the framework of “here’s what I think…” as opposed to “science and history tell us that…” For instance, it’s impossible to say exactly why Clinton is staying in the race, as no one can read minds. Science and history tell us that. Yes, she could believe she has a better chance of winning. She could also believe that she just really wants to be president, so there. She could believe that Obama is secretly a Scientologist. The point is, no one knows what she really believes. Indeed, no one can.
Jerome, on the other hand, tosses around what appear to be concrete facts. Like how many votes Obama currently is ahead, and how Clinton will ultimately be the popular vote winner. Unfortunately, he omits key assumptions like using 0 votes for Michigan. Or, even that the “popular vote” is not a directly measurable quantity, but requires a degree of estimation.
As I say, there’s been a high degree of hackery in the campaign. It’s the form of hackery that Jerome uses that I object most strongly to.
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
You can try Counter Culture coffees at: - Baked and Wired, 1052 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, 202-333-2500; www.bakedandwired.com [Link]
In sum, we concluded that the evidence showed that Goodling violated both federal law and Department policy, and therefore committed misconduct... [Link]
The best way to make sense of this legal tangle is to mouse over the title of an individual scandal, which will highlight everyone implicated. [Link]
A 22-year-old bicyclist was struck by a garbage truck and killed just north of Dupont Circle today, authorities said. Police and fire vehicles converged on the scene at 20th and R streets NW, snarling Connecticut Avenue traffic during the morning rush. [Link]
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
The report notes that the administration has gone to “unprecedented lengths to control and suppress information about the human cost” of the wars. [Link]
"We see a tipping point occurring right before our eyes," Hansen said during his appearance at the National Press Club. "The Arctic is the first tipping point and it's occurring exactly the way we said it would." [Link]
It appeared to confirm for the first time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized during the Bush administration. [Link]
"After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be ans [Link]
It gives me a terrible mental image of the whole country linking arms and goose-stepping in unison, with the politicians out in front doing a straight-armed salute. [Link]
BOULTON: There are those who would say look, lets take Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Ghraib, and rendition and all those things and to them that is the complete opposite of freedom. BUSH: Of course, if you want to slander America. [Link]
In a subsequent e-mail to the employee, Cargol described himself as “a rub-your-belly, grab-your-balls, give-you-a-hug, slap-your-back, pull-your-dick, squeeze-your-hand, cheek-your-face, and pat-your-thigh kind of guy.” [Link]
Democracy Now! Radio and TV News [Link]
Let's take a look at how the Los Angeles Times covered the new Senate Intelligence Committee report on the claims made as part of selling the Iraq war, and compare it to how the editorial page of the Washington Post, by which I mean Fred Hiatt, sees the e [Link]
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that the Iraq war was sold to the American people with a sophisticated "political propaganda campaign" led by President Bush and aimed at "manipulating sources of public opinion" an [Link]
27 queries. 0.422 seconds