progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
This is a hoot:
Have you dated liberals before? If so, any difference you can tell between liberal and conservative guys?
Absolutely. It’s kind of like night and day. I have always had a policy of not dating liberals, but once, after a bad break-up, I dated a couple of liberal guys…
First of all, they don’t have the same values and I find that to be a fundamental problem. I know a lot of people are willing to accept that, but I’m not. Their whole world view is different from someone who has conservative values and traditional values as a way of life.
Being focused on yourself, and your rights, and materialism, and no ultimate sense of morality — because I guess when you believe in a more secular way of life, a more liberal viewpoint, it’s all about what you can do for yourself and how you can be happy…and you don’t have any belief in absolute truth or religious principles to guide how you live. You get guys who are selfish and into themselves and don’t care so much about humanity, other people, or me — that just leads to a lot of problems. I also have a problem with guys who are into things like getting completely trashed and doing drugs…
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
The report notes that the administration has gone to “unprecedented lengths to control and suppress information about the human cost” of the wars. [Link]
"We see a tipping point occurring right before our eyes," Hansen said during his appearance at the National Press Club. "The Arctic is the first tipping point and it's occurring exactly the way we said it would." [Link]
It appeared to confirm for the first time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized during the Bush administration. [Link]
"After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be ans [Link]
It gives me a terrible mental image of the whole country linking arms and goose-stepping in unison, with the politicians out in front doing a straight-armed salute. [Link]
BOULTON: There are those who would say look, lets take Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Ghraib, and rendition and all those things and to them that is the complete opposite of freedom. BUSH: Of course, if you want to slander America. [Link]
In a subsequent e-mail to the employee, Cargol described himself as “a rub-your-belly, grab-your-balls, give-you-a-hug, slap-your-back, pull-your-dick, squeeze-your-hand, cheek-your-face, and pat-your-thigh kind of guy.” [Link]
Democracy Now! Radio and TV News [Link]
Let's take a look at how the Los Angeles Times covered the new Senate Intelligence Committee report on the claims made as part of selling the Iraq war, and compare it to how the editorial page of the Washington Post, by which I mean Fred Hiatt, sees the e [Link]
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that the Iraq war was sold to the American people with a sophisticated "political propaganda campaign" led by President Bush and aimed at "manipulating sources of public opinion" an [Link]
Hertzberg's analysis is noteworthy because he appears to be able to allow several ideas to coexist in his head simultaneously, which quite an achievement these days. [Link]
That night, George Stephanopoulos, who was then a top aide to Mr. Clinton, declared that it was “mathematically impossible for Brown to get the nomination” — the start of a campaign to declare Mr. Clinton the presumed nominee, even as several other [Link]
If Obama is the nominee, Tonay said, McCain will be just fine with her. "In the end, I won't vote for Obama because I don't know who he is, and I don't trust him," she said. [Link]
Robert Reich, who went to Yale Law School with Hillary Rodham and Bill Clinton and later served in the Clinton administration, called Hillary Clinton's attack on Obama "absurd,&q~ adding: "That carries guilt by association to a new level of absurdity. [Link]
Some speculate the Senator Clinton would want the spirit-killing Vice Presidency because she would be willing to wait for two terms so as to be the likely nominee in 2012. I believe that she could well contemplate this scenario. [Link]
A subsequent study by the National Bureau of Economic Research showed that gas prices fell by 3 percent, meaning that only three fifths of the savings from reduced taxes was passed on to consumers. [Link]
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is filing a complaint with the IRS today challenging the conservative group Freedom's Watch status as a non-profit. [Link]
For Barbara, Hillary has become the screech on the blackboard. From First Lady to Lady Macbeth. [Link]
So what's changed? I asked Reich. "I saw the ads" — the negative man-on-street commercials that the Clinton campaign put up in Pennsylvania in the wake of Obama's bitter/cling comments a week ago — "and I was appalled, frankly. [Link]
27 queries. 0.437 seconds
March 31st, 2008 at 9:21 pm
To be liberal is to be focused on yourself, your rights, and materialism, and no ultimate sense of morality? Please explain. I think anyone, conservative, liberal, progressive, moderate, lost, found, etc. can be the things you describe. There is a Hitler and a Mother Theresa in everyone, no? What is the absolute truth that guides how you live? I’m trying to understand what conservatives think, so I’m communicating, trying to learn.
Off I go on my search to learn, clarify, and meet others who might perceive differently than I…..
March 31st, 2008 at 10:46 pm
I’m only guessing here, but Sharon, who is the one being quoted, may be taking her views from the fundamentalist strain of conservatism. She’s describing the conservative stereotype of a liberal- secular humanist, amoral, etc. The way that she takes it to the next step: “focused on yourself,” “guys who are selfish and into themselves,” “don’t care so much about humanity” sounds like she may just be talking about, well… kids. Probably the vast majority of us as we enter that awkward post-college phase.
April 1st, 2008 at 4:34 am
That reminds me of this:
http://WWW.samefacts.com/archives/campaign_2008_/2008/01/obamas_liberalism_and_conservative_voters.php
April 1st, 2008 at 10:25 am
Yep, that one’s a keeper all right: “no sane person, he thought, would seriously refer to himself as a liberal, any more than one would refer to oneself as a sociopath or a hypocrite.”
April 1st, 2008 at 1:04 pm
I think she’s using “materialism” to mean believing that the material world is all there is and spiritual concerns are meaningless, which she no doubt connects with liberals, who are apparently all completely nonreligious (or even antireligious) as far as she knows. My first thought on hearing “materialism”, on the other hand, is that it refers to obsession with accumulating material goods, which I’d connect with practitioners of “prosperity theology” and with the corporate greedo wing of the Republican Party (though there are certainly liberals who are caught up in the race for the shiniest gadgets too).
April 1st, 2008 at 2:00 pm
Yeah, I couldn’t get past the “materialism” thing, I kept thinking “WTF, you’re the ones that are the materialists, as opposed to the liberal DFH’s.” Materialism as opposed to spiritualism works here, at least in the limited sense of fundamentalist spirituality (teh abortion bad, teh gays bad, teh socialism bad).
April 1st, 2008 at 10:09 pm
It’s a well known fact that ideological conservatives (at least most of them) throw around words like “materialist” or “Marxist” without actually knowing what they mean.
April 3rd, 2008 at 6:45 am
I think it’s very important for us liberals to understand, like that article points out, when we use the word liberal and when conservatives do, we’re talking about two completely different things. The way they define it, I’m not a liberal either: I abhor pornography, dress very “conservatively”, and I have a strict code of conduct that does not include excessive drinking or gambling or profligate spending. In many ways, I am more “conservative” than Mary Matelin–have you seen her house? Pink and orange and polka dots! I’d never!
We really need to find common ground on lifestyle issues to start the conversation. Ask the next conservative you meet how he or she feels about orange polkadots in the dining room, and see where that leads.