progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
I’d like to ask a question based on a common theme found in today’s Glenn Greenwald Salon editorial, and Dan Froomkin’s White House Watch. Both are partly motivated by the timing of the Federalist Society Convention in our fair city, which I think we all agree is icky.
Glenn excerpts Bush’s speech at the Zombie Fest, aghast that Bush appears to claim to respect the constitution, and the three branches of government as co-equals. Here’s what Bush said:
When the Founders drafted the Constitution, they had a clear understanding of tyranny. They also had a clear idea about how to prevent it from ever taking root in America. Their solution was to separate the government’s powers into three co-equal branches: the executive, the legislature, and the judiciary. Each of these branches plays a vital role in our free society. Each serves as a check on the others. And to preserve our liberty, each must meet its responsibilities — and resist the temptation to encroach on the powers the Constitution accords to others.
I was walkin’ down the street, and was ambushed by these dudes from the Congress and Judiciary. They encroached on me, shoving all kinds of checks and balances in my face. So I showed ‘em who’s boss, heh heh. Just sayin’: some of us are more co-equal than others, heh heh.
If I could hazard a guess to what Bush means by preserving our liberty, I guess he’s picturing a world where young aristocrats blow-up frogs with firecrackers. That’s the liberty that needs to be preserved.
Froomkin instead focuses on the way in which Bush has permeated the Supreme Court with the candidates for Zombiehood that you will find in this week’s Whigathon:
So last night’s 25th anniversary gala for the Federalist Society, complete with a keynote from Bush himself, was an orgy of self-celebration. Membership in (or at least affiliation with) the reactionary legal group is practically a requirement for Bush appointees to the bench or top legal jobs.
Which brings me to my question: Why? Why do the things they do? Why do tthey care so much about expanding the power of the president? And, since this is a purely neo-Republican movement, why don’t they consider the possibility that the president could be, very soon indeed, not a neo-Republican?
The evangelical part of Bush’s base I can actually understand. They start with the idea that Christ, the Messiah was the Son of the Creator of the Universe. But, Christ did many other things beyond this, various miracles: turning wine into a prohibition against wine or raising from homosexuality into leprosy. This while teaching a philosophy based on the idea that the unborn were sacred, but the living needed to pay their own health insurance.
To fix the institution of Christianity into a permanent foundation, Christ would return to Jerusalem where he would defeat the anti-Christ, who walks among us. Then, he would throw all the non-Christians into a lake of fire, and there would be an enormous secular barbecue.
Therefore, it’s important for evangelicals to get someone on the court who will overturn Roe v. Wade.
Crazy? Sure. But, though there be madness, there is method in it.
The Federalist Society on the other hand? I’m totally lost on their motivation.
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
You can try Counter Culture coffees at: - Baked and Wired, 1052 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, 202-333-2500; www.bakedandwired.com [Link]
In sum, we concluded that the evidence showed that Goodling violated both federal law and Department policy, and therefore committed misconduct... [Link]
The best way to make sense of this legal tangle is to mouse over the title of an individual scandal, which will highlight everyone implicated. [Link]
A 22-year-old bicyclist was struck by a garbage truck and killed just north of Dupont Circle today, authorities said. Police and fire vehicles converged on the scene at 20th and R streets NW, snarling Connecticut Avenue traffic during the morning rush. [Link]
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
The report notes that the administration has gone to “unprecedented lengths to control and suppress information about the human cost” of the wars. [Link]
"We see a tipping point occurring right before our eyes," Hansen said during his appearance at the National Press Club. "The Arctic is the first tipping point and it's occurring exactly the way we said it would." [Link]
It appeared to confirm for the first time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized during the Bush administration. [Link]
"After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be ans [Link]
It gives me a terrible mental image of the whole country linking arms and goose-stepping in unison, with the politicians out in front doing a straight-armed salute. [Link]
BOULTON: There are those who would say look, lets take Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Ghraib, and rendition and all those things and to them that is the complete opposite of freedom. BUSH: Of course, if you want to slander America. [Link]
In a subsequent e-mail to the employee, Cargol described himself as “a rub-your-belly, grab-your-balls, give-you-a-hug, slap-your-back, pull-your-dick, squeeze-your-hand, cheek-your-face, and pat-your-thigh kind of guy.” [Link]
Democracy Now! Radio and TV News [Link]
Let's take a look at how the Los Angeles Times covered the new Senate Intelligence Committee report on the claims made as part of selling the Iraq war, and compare it to how the editorial page of the Washington Post, by which I mean Fred Hiatt, sees the e [Link]
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that the Iraq war was sold to the American people with a sophisticated "political propaganda campaign" led by President Bush and aimed at "manipulating sources of public opinion" an [Link]
27 queries. 0.632 seconds