progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
I’ve come to understand over a number of years that I’m not ever going to be a popular blogger.
Why do I say that? Well, there’s no short answer to that question. But I’ll start with a subject that always provokes an argument: never listen to critics. Which I mean sincerely. The people who are hired to criticize books, movies, music, art, etc., don’t really have a sufficient grasp of their subject to say the things that they get printed.
That idea alone makes me an eccentric. Yet, time and again I see the most god awful stuff praised as high art, while something true to form, and even clever, is tossed in the trash bin.
As an example I’ll take M. Night Shyamalan’s “Lady in the Water.” I thought this film was very clever. “Lady in the Water” is an adaptation of a very old allegory about finding one’s place in the world. The allegory goes like this: imagine a majestic estate with the master of the house away. While the master has gone a very curious thing has happened. The cook thinks he’s a musician, the musicians are taking care of the children, the children are in charge of the medicine cabinet, and the doctor is making bread. As the allegory goes, everything must be put in its proper place before the master can return home.
That in a nutshell is the plot of the movie. I’ll agree that if you had no familiarity with the original allegory you would have a hard time with “Lady in the Water.” But seriously, when I read stuff like this:
“Fans of actor Paul Giamatti or of filmmaker M. Night Shyamalan may get something out of Lady in the Water, a fractured fairy tale about a water nymph who comes to a Philadelphia apartment house to deliver an important message. Anyone else is likely to be perplexed by the muddled mythmaking or actively astonished at the self-indulgent ego of a writer-director-producer who casts himself in the role of a visionary writer whose martyrdom will change the world.”
I have to wonder: is there no one who publishes who still reads?
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
You can try Counter Culture coffees at: - Baked and Wired, 1052 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, 202-333-2500; www.bakedandwired.com [Link]
In sum, we concluded that the evidence showed that Goodling violated both federal law and Department policy, and therefore committed misconduct... [Link]
The best way to make sense of this legal tangle is to mouse over the title of an individual scandal, which will highlight everyone implicated. [Link]
A 22-year-old bicyclist was struck by a garbage truck and killed just north of Dupont Circle today, authorities said. Police and fire vehicles converged on the scene at 20th and R streets NW, snarling Connecticut Avenue traffic during the morning rush. [Link]
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
The report notes that the administration has gone to “unprecedented lengths to control and suppress information about the human cost” of the wars. [Link]
"We see a tipping point occurring right before our eyes," Hansen said during his appearance at the National Press Club. "The Arctic is the first tipping point and it's occurring exactly the way we said it would." [Link]
It appeared to confirm for the first time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized during the Bush administration. [Link]
"After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be ans [Link]
It gives me a terrible mental image of the whole country linking arms and goose-stepping in unison, with the politicians out in front doing a straight-armed salute. [Link]
BOULTON: There are those who would say look, lets take Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Ghraib, and rendition and all those things and to them that is the complete opposite of freedom. BUSH: Of course, if you want to slander America. [Link]
In a subsequent e-mail to the employee, Cargol described himself as “a rub-your-belly, grab-your-balls, give-you-a-hug, slap-your-back, pull-your-dick, squeeze-your-hand, cheek-your-face, and pat-your-thigh kind of guy.” [Link]
Democracy Now! Radio and TV News [Link]
Let's take a look at how the Los Angeles Times covered the new Senate Intelligence Committee report on the claims made as part of selling the Iraq war, and compare it to how the editorial page of the Washington Post, by which I mean Fred Hiatt, sees the e [Link]
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that the Iraq war was sold to the American people with a sophisticated "political propaganda campaign" led by President Bush and aimed at "manipulating sources of public opinion" an [Link]
27 queries. 0.479 seconds
September 18th, 2007 at 2:22 am
I’m not familiar with that allegory, but I remember a children’s book I used to read to my kids. Farmer Right is perplexed when his cows say Baa, his horse says Moo, his sheep Neigh, etc. It sounds like a similar theme.
And I agree about the critics. And I am pretty certain that publishers don’t read, at least my manuscripts.
September 18th, 2007 at 9:53 am
I can’t until the critics get their hands on the Beowulf movie.
September 18th, 2007 at 10:06 am
KathyF: Your experience suggests a new version of the story. Author Right is perplexed when the critic goes “mooo” and the publisher goes “baaa”.
Jamelle: That raises a very interesting question. Will any of the critics who write about the upcoming Beowulf have read the story?
Of course, you never know how faithful the director is going to be to the original. You may remember they redid the ending to the Scarlett Letter. When asked to comment Demi Moore said: “I doubt most people have read the book, anyway.”
September 18th, 2007 at 11:03 am
Will the Beowulf movie have anything to do with the actual epic? From the trailer I assumed that they took the name and the monster and maybe a couple of plot elements and surrounded them with a story they made up out of whole cloth. Not sure I’ll watch it anyway, since I can’t stand that creepy “uncanny valley” animation where they try to make the people look realistic.
September 20th, 2007 at 12:51 pm
AltHippo, I have a feeling that a fair number of the critics who review the Beowulf movie will have had little to no experience with the actual epic.
To be fair, I do think that KCinDC is right, and that the movie will have little to do with the epic, which is a shame, since I think that Beowulf is awesome enough so that you don’t have to do too much “adaptation.”