alternative hippopotamus

progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital

May 18, 2007

Shaha Riza: Tell Us What You Really Think

by @ 10:56 am. Filed under Uncategorized

From today’s WaPo, Shaha Riza on the unfairness of Wolfie and her current demise:

On several occasions she noted that there were other couples working at the bank and that some wives of high-ranking officials were not required to leave their jobs, and she said that it would have been nice if a bank official could have “at least explained to me why I was being treated in a different way to all other spouses in this place.”

“Or maybe,” she continued, “I was wondering, maybe because they’re married, they’re seeing that their relationships are asexual. But because I’m dating, there must be sex there.”

Uh, moving right along, Wijffels asked: “Did you consult with” Wolfowitz, “either directly or indirectly, concerning the . . . terms you proposed to” the bank’s personnel chief?

“If you think I’m angry now,” she responded, “you should see me angry then. No, of course not, because I thought he should have fought the decision by the ethics committee. He became them, you, the bank, and I had to fend for myself exactly the same way I’m fending for myself now.”

Either Ms. Riza really doesn’t understand why Wolfowitz set himself up for an ethical conflict, or she’s just screwing with people’s minds. The problem is when one person works for another, and they have a personal relationship, then there’s an imbalance of power that predictably leads to problems. I don’t think anyone cares about two people who are dating in different parts of an organization. Though, where I work all interpersonal relationships are discouraged among employees. I can imagine for some people this would be a problem, but in my case, the people I work with really aren’t that interesting.

Something tells me that Riza understands a thing or two about sex and power. Note the way she answers the question about consulting with Wolfie about getting a raise: ““If you think I’m angry now,” she responded, “you should see me angry then. No, of course not, because I thought he should have fought the decision by the ethics committee.”

So, she let Wolfie know she was very upset, and upset with him specifically, because he wasn’t behaving manly enough in standing up to the committee. So, what could Wolfie do to prove that he was looking out for her interests? Hmm…

Bookmark on del.icio.us

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

[powered by WordPress.]

hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.

contact

TBA 2008

The Alternative Hypothesis

the elephants of anwr

issues and insight

capitolists

alt media

sounds

critical resources

flora and fauna

law & order

events

cinema

literati

propaganda

use with extreme caution

internal links:

categories:

search blog:

archives:

May 2007
M T W T F S S
« Apr   Jun »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031  

other:

95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary

comments

Recent Comments

HippoWire

  • Recent Trackbacks:

  • 27 queries. 0.461 seconds