progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
ThinkProgress has a good post up looking at the wingnut talking points in Hiatt’s WaPo editorial. Indeed, it’s important to note that there’s not much in the original editorial that isn’t a wingnut talking point.
To be fair there’s this in the beginning: (WaPo)
The former chief of staff to Vice President Cheney told the FBI and a grand jury that he had not leaked the identity of CIA employee Valerie Plame to journalists but rather had learned it from them. But abundant testimony at his trial showed that he had found out about Ms. Plame from official sources and was dedicated to discrediting her husband, former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV. Particularly for a senior government official, lying under oath is a serious offense. Mr. Libby’s conviction should send a message to this and future administrations about the dangers of attempting to block official investigations.
That’s what I refer to as the legitimate part of the editorial. It’s a sound point: since the actions of government officials reflect on their feudal overlords, I mean their administration, they must be particularly scrupulous in their behavior.
This goes to the essence of the problem, and by “problem” I’m really thinking of the Bush administration as a whole: Libby does indeed reflect on Bush’s administration. All too accurately. The Bushies have shown time and time again that they believe that as President, co-President, and Chief Lackey, Bush, Cheney, Rove et al are above the law. Or, more exactly, beyond the law. Since they “make” the law, by definition the law doesn’t apply to them.
If Cheney didn’t agree with Wilson’s “What I Didn’t Find in Africa,” he should have had Scooter write a rebuttal, which I’m sure the NYT would have been delighted to punish.
But what would have been the fun in that? Much better to selectively declassify information and leak it to friendly MSM reporters. And, if you can smear the author of the original OpEd, and ruin his wife’s career at the sime time, so much the better. Why, it’s a Rover twofer!
I say that if the jury thought Libby was a fall guy for the sins of the administration, so what? His actions faithfully represented hiss bosses’ views as being above the rest of us.
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
You can try Counter Culture coffees at: - Baked and Wired, 1052 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, 202-333-2500; www.bakedandwired.com [Link]
In sum, we concluded that the evidence showed that Goodling violated both federal law and Department policy, and therefore committed misconduct... [Link]
The best way to make sense of this legal tangle is to mouse over the title of an individual scandal, which will highlight everyone implicated. [Link]
A 22-year-old bicyclist was struck by a garbage truck and killed just north of Dupont Circle today, authorities said. Police and fire vehicles converged on the scene at 20th and R streets NW, snarling Connecticut Avenue traffic during the morning rush. [Link]
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
The report notes that the administration has gone to “unprecedented lengths to control and suppress information about the human cost” of the wars. [Link]
"We see a tipping point occurring right before our eyes," Hansen said during his appearance at the National Press Club. "The Arctic is the first tipping point and it's occurring exactly the way we said it would." [Link]
It appeared to confirm for the first time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized during the Bush administration. [Link]
"After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be ans [Link]
It gives me a terrible mental image of the whole country linking arms and goose-stepping in unison, with the politicians out in front doing a straight-armed salute. [Link]
BOULTON: There are those who would say look, lets take Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Ghraib, and rendition and all those things and to them that is the complete opposite of freedom. BUSH: Of course, if you want to slander America. [Link]
In a subsequent e-mail to the employee, Cargol described himself as “a rub-your-belly, grab-your-balls, give-you-a-hug, slap-your-back, pull-your-dick, squeeze-your-hand, cheek-your-face, and pat-your-thigh kind of guy.” [Link]
Democracy Now! Radio and TV News [Link]
Let's take a look at how the Los Angeles Times covered the new Senate Intelligence Committee report on the claims made as part of selling the Iraq war, and compare it to how the editorial page of the Washington Post, by which I mean Fred Hiatt, sees the e [Link]
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that the Iraq war was sold to the American people with a sophisticated "political propaganda campaign" led by President Bush and aimed at "manipulating sources of public opinion" an [Link]
27 queries. 0.499 seconds