progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
I haven’t had much to say about the primary battle between Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman. Since I don’t live in Connecticut, it’s mostly none of my business. Or, at least that’s what I’ve been thinking.
After reading Josh Marshall’s note on Lieberman, I’ve got to say Lieberman’s behavior disturbs me. It’s made me wonder if this will play out like a Shakespearean tragedy, with Lieberman trying to take the party down with him:
Al Gore picked Joe Lieberman in 2000. And fairly quickly he starts thinking he’s better at running for president than Al. As one close-up Joe-watcher puts it (and I’m paraphrasing) Lieberman was terrible in 2000. And as he travelled the country he was more and more alienated from rank and file Democrats. Only he thought he’d done great.
Let me pick up the thread from another close-up Joe-watcher: “My guess. He watched Gore during the campaign and decided he could do better. He started thinking of the day he’d run on his own. This was first evidenced after the election when he sold Gore out on the soldiers vote issue. Here he’s on the ticket and he is pandering to the right to make himself look good. I think he decided that he wins even if Gore loses … Then he runs in ‘04 and sees that his success in 2000 as a candidate was not really his but Gore’s. He was a great #2 but not a free standing great man. He was rejected. And he became bitter. Very bitter.”
That is speculative, of course, but the explanation that seems most closely in line with Lieberman’s actions. I’m thinking in particular with his line during the 2004 primaries about how we’re safer because we invaded Iraq. Not only was that a suspect line, but it undermined a wedge issue for the Democrats.
Then, there’s the problem that if Lieberman loses the primary, he’s going to run against a Democrat. That’s an overtly hostile act directed at what is, allegedly, his party.
What I’m suggesting is that Lieberman feels rejected, and he’s more mad at the Democrats, particularly grass-roots Democrats, than the Republicans.
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
The Labor Department announced this morning that new applications for jobless benefits rose to a seasonally adjusted 542,000 last week. It also revised the figure from the previous week down to 515,000. [Link]
A team from IBM has spent the past several years constructing a virtual-world version of China's Forbidden City. [Link]
Following confirmation that Google intends to open its virtual world Lively to games developers, creative director Kevin Hanna has revealed the long-term goal is for the service to become an online games platform. [Link]
CHIBA, Japan (AP) -- Video game rivals Sony and Microsoft are going head-to-head in virtual worlds for their home consoles later this year. [Link]
a) He was paid by Dick Cheney's henchwoman Mary Matalin to write a book on Obama [Link]
One bunch of guys is getting up and saying, "we hafta." Another bunch of guys is getting up and saying, "nuh-uh." [Link]
To be able to say to folks, "You can keep what you have" is a big political selling point. [Link]
Here, based on 16 years experience watching Bill Clinton campaign โ and interviews with a half-dozen veterans of his political teams โ is a reasonably safe bet about his campaign advice to Barack Obama: [Link]
WASHINGTON โ Government officials handling billions of dollars in oil royalties improperly engaged in sex with employees of energy companies they were dealing with and received numerous gifts from them, federal investigators said Wednesday. [Link]
We are going to have a new administration. Do we want these policies continued or not? [Link]
You can try Counter Culture coffees at: - Baked and Wired, 1052 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, 202-333-2500; www.bakedandwired.com [Link]
In sum, we concluded that the evidence showed that Goodling violated both federal law and Department policy, and therefore committed misconduct... [Link]
The best way to make sense of this legal tangle is to mouse over the title of an individual scandal, which will highlight everyone implicated. [Link]
A 22-year-old bicyclist was struck by a garbage truck and killed just north of Dupont Circle today, authorities said. Police and fire vehicles converged on the scene at 20th and R streets NW, snarling Connecticut Avenue traffic during the morning rush. [Link]
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
27 queries. 1.072 seconds
August 1st, 2006 at 4:36 pm
I was in Connecticut this weekend and Lamont signs outnumbered Lieberman lawn signs
by a big margin. Hardly scientific. In talking with friends and family, the anger about
Lieberman on Iraq is about equal to their anger over Bush. I don’t know if this bias sampling
constitutes grass roots, but if he’s defeated in the primiary he will have no shot as
as independent. Weicker ran as an independent for governor but he was widely popular even
if his Gold Coast neighbors suspected he would champion an income tax (he did support
an income tax once elected).
If Lieberman looses the primary it will be because of his Iraq position and he won’t
recover from that.
August 1st, 2006 at 6:16 pm
Thanks for that! It always pays to get the word from folks actually there.
August 5th, 2006 at 11:47 am
My mom lives in Fairfield County, which is Lamont country as far as she can tell. She’s been voluteering at the local Lamont HQ. I’ve been phone banking for Lamont from here in PA via Move On and I’m getting a Lamont lead by about a third.
August 5th, 2006 at 1:58 pm
Phone banking sounds like a great idea.
My impression is that the Lieberman/Lamont primary is like the Cindy Sheehan campout of last summer. It’s created positive energy going into the November elections in a way no one could have predicted beforehand.