progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
Peter Daou and I seem to have some kind of a mind meld going on. About the same time we both noticed that Tom Maguire had done an excerpt and excise (aka hack) job on this Glenn Greenwald post.
I commented at Glenn’s place, and he wrote back: (my remarks italicized)
I find this omission significant, as it really goes towards the heart of your argument. The point is that the cult of Bush is based in personality rather than principles. For instance, that we need to be skeptical towards a government who insists on new powers, or insists that they’ve had those powers all along.
Exactly - and what I find most disturbing about Tom’s behavior - and most reflective of its intellectual dishonesty - is that in reply to an e-mail he sent me notifying me of his first post, I told him I thought he had “replied” only to a stripped-down, caricatured version of my argument - where he was able to mock it as empty only by ignoring all of its substance.
I even listed five arguments supporting my position which he ignored (including the paragraph you just cited about the disappearance among “conservatives” of distrust of governmental power), and told him that if he wanted to address the argument, he should at least characterize it honestly and respond to the substance.
After I wrote that e-mail (which he didn’t reply to), he wrote two more posts childishly mocking my argument (oh-so-cleverly calling it “flatulence” and “a brain fart”) but continuing to ignore the arguments I told him he overlooked.
And he wasn’t alone. None of them responded to the claim in that paragraph you cite, or the FISA reversal, or any of the other arguments demonstrating that loyalty to the Leader has obliterated allegiance to conservative political principles. That’s why I hadn’t bothered responding further since that first reply I wrote. Despite the large number of posts written by Bush followers about my original post, there was really nothing to reply to.
Tom?
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
The report notes that the administration has gone to “unprecedented lengths to control and suppress information about the human cost” of the wars. [Link]
"We see a tipping point occurring right before our eyes," Hansen said during his appearance at the National Press Club. "The Arctic is the first tipping point and it's occurring exactly the way we said it would." [Link]
It appeared to confirm for the first time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized during the Bush administration. [Link]
"After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be ans [Link]
It gives me a terrible mental image of the whole country linking arms and goose-stepping in unison, with the politicians out in front doing a straight-armed salute. [Link]
BOULTON: There are those who would say look, lets take Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Ghraib, and rendition and all those things and to them that is the complete opposite of freedom. BUSH: Of course, if you want to slander America. [Link]
In a subsequent e-mail to the employee, Cargol described himself as “a rub-your-belly, grab-your-balls, give-you-a-hug, slap-your-back, pull-your-dick, squeeze-your-hand, cheek-your-face, and pat-your-thigh kind of guy.” [Link]
Democracy Now! Radio and TV News [Link]
Let's take a look at how the Los Angeles Times covered the new Senate Intelligence Committee report on the claims made as part of selling the Iraq war, and compare it to how the editorial page of the Washington Post, by which I mean Fred Hiatt, sees the e [Link]
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that the Iraq war was sold to the American people with a sophisticated "political propaganda campaign" led by President Bush and aimed at "manipulating sources of public opinion" an [Link]
Hertzberg's analysis is noteworthy because he appears to be able to allow several ideas to coexist in his head simultaneously, which quite an achievement these days. [Link]
That night, George Stephanopoulos, who was then a top aide to Mr. Clinton, declared that it was “mathematically impossible for Brown to get the nomination” — the start of a campaign to declare Mr. Clinton the presumed nominee, even as several other [Link]
If Obama is the nominee, Tonay said, McCain will be just fine with her. "In the end, I won't vote for Obama because I don't know who he is, and I don't trust him," she said. [Link]
Robert Reich, who went to Yale Law School with Hillary Rodham and Bill Clinton and later served in the Clinton administration, called Hillary Clinton's attack on Obama "absurd,&q~ adding: "That carries guilt by association to a new level of absurdity. [Link]
Some speculate the Senator Clinton would want the spirit-killing Vice Presidency because she would be willing to wait for two terms so as to be the likely nominee in 2012. I believe that she could well contemplate this scenario. [Link]
A subsequent study by the National Bureau of Economic Research showed that gas prices fell by 3 percent, meaning that only three fifths of the savings from reduced taxes was passed on to consumers. [Link]
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is filing a complaint with the IRS today challenging the conservative group Freedom's Watch status as a non-profit. [Link]
For Barbara, Hillary has become the screech on the blackboard. From First Lady to Lady Macbeth. [Link]
So what's changed? I asked Reich. "I saw the ads" — the negative man-on-street commercials that the Clinton campaign put up in Pennsylvania in the wake of Obama's bitter/cling comments a week ago — "and I was appalled, frankly. [Link]
27 queries. 0.460 seconds