progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
David Corn is mostly correct when he says:
Here’s the problem for the Democrats: they so botched the hearings–getting stuck in legal reeds rather than defining the Alito debate in broad, stark and dramatic terms that might resonate with the public beyond those already following the hearings–that they did not lay a foundation for an effective filibuster. There is substantive reason and justification for a filibuster–no lawmaker is compelled to vote for a justice whom he or she believes will undo important rights and make the nation worse off–but the political contours of the Alito nomination render such an effort mostly moot.
When I say “mostly correct,” I mean in the political calculation he’s right. But in the noetic sense, where real-world events are informed by principle he’s dead wrong.
After Alito was nominated I did my homework, and really believed that barring a compromising photograph of Alito with a lhassa apso, there was no way to stop his nomination. In the conventional sense, Alito is qualified to be a judge. Not my kind of guy, but clearly the kind of guy that plays in Missoula.
Over the last few weeks I’ve come to see what the implications of the Theory of the Unitary Executive are. If the spectacle of a potential fillibuster can bring a little light to what this means, then so much the better. Which is why I support what Kerry and Kennedy are doing, despite the political calculation.
The least surprising implication of the Unitary Executive is that it would make impeachment of a sitting president impossible. How, after all, could an act be considered a “High Crime and Misdemeanor” if the act is subject to the interpretation of the perpetrator of that act? The reason I say this shouldn’t be surprising, is that the notion of the Unitary Executive was created in the wake of Watergate so that Watergate would never be repeated. Nixon’s crimes could be repeated, but not the investigation of those crimes.
It’s not escaped many of us that the “War on Terrorism” has been defined in such a way as to make it a permanent war. If, as folks like Alberto Gonzales maintain, the President has sweeping “Commander-in-Chief” powers for the duration of this so-called “War” this turns the notion of a Democratic Republic into a Republican Democracy.
I’m afraid that what we have to look forward to is the conspiracy of Executive powers with one-party rule. Unfortunately, the Constitution does not begin with “We the Republican Party.”
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
You can try Counter Culture coffees at: - Baked and Wired, 1052 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, 202-333-2500; www.bakedandwired.com [Link]
In sum, we concluded that the evidence showed that Goodling violated both federal law and Department policy, and therefore committed misconduct... [Link]
The best way to make sense of this legal tangle is to mouse over the title of an individual scandal, which will highlight everyone implicated. [Link]
A 22-year-old bicyclist was struck by a garbage truck and killed just north of Dupont Circle today, authorities said. Police and fire vehicles converged on the scene at 20th and R streets NW, snarling Connecticut Avenue traffic during the morning rush. [Link]
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
The report notes that the administration has gone to “unprecedented lengths to control and suppress information about the human cost” of the wars. [Link]
"We see a tipping point occurring right before our eyes," Hansen said during his appearance at the National Press Club. "The Arctic is the first tipping point and it's occurring exactly the way we said it would." [Link]
It appeared to confirm for the first time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized during the Bush administration. [Link]
"After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be ans [Link]
It gives me a terrible mental image of the whole country linking arms and goose-stepping in unison, with the politicians out in front doing a straight-armed salute. [Link]
BOULTON: There are those who would say look, lets take Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Ghraib, and rendition and all those things and to them that is the complete opposite of freedom. BUSH: Of course, if you want to slander America. [Link]
In a subsequent e-mail to the employee, Cargol described himself as “a rub-your-belly, grab-your-balls, give-you-a-hug, slap-your-back, pull-your-dick, squeeze-your-hand, cheek-your-face, and pat-your-thigh kind of guy.” [Link]
Democracy Now! Radio and TV News [Link]
Let's take a look at how the Los Angeles Times covered the new Senate Intelligence Committee report on the claims made as part of selling the Iraq war, and compare it to how the editorial page of the Washington Post, by which I mean Fred Hiatt, sees the e [Link]
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that the Iraq war was sold to the American people with a sophisticated "political propaganda campaign" led by President Bush and aimed at "manipulating sources of public opinion" an [Link]
27 queries. 0.509 seconds
January 28th, 2006 at 12:43 pm
Huh!
That’s an interesting take on it, similar to where I was approaching it from, but I was thinking that the Unitary Executive was a throwback to the halycon Federalist days of Adams and the Alien and Sedition acts.
*does more research*
January 28th, 2006 at 12:58 pm
John Yoo, who was one of the architects of the Unitary Executive in the Reagan Justice department, has written a series of papers that attempt to backdate the idea to George Washington.
Yoo, as far as I can tell, is like a character out of a lost Orwell novel. Kind of like the guy who has to constantly rewrite the news to keep up with the latest speech from Big Brother.