progressive cyberdadaism from our nation’s capital
This is honestly just dumb. The story we’re all talking about isn’t a story about how, in September and October 2001, the president authorized some kind of illegal program on a temporary emergency basis before getting things sorted out. That would arguably be forgivable, depending on the details of the hypothetical. The story we’re talking about is that today, on December 27, 2005, more than four years after 9/11, the president is still authorizing some sort of illegal, secret surveillance program.
As does Ezra Klein:
Put another way, although the administration could’ve followed the law, it chose not to because the law is cumbersome and dusty. So, of course, is the Constitution (which was fully ratified in 1790, when they didn’t even have e-mail!) and any number of largely uncontroversial statutes. The question here is whether the Bush administration is really prepared to brandish a theory of law that renders legislation optional when it requires procedural steps and was enacted 30 or more years prior.
In my opinion, Matt and Ezra are being astute observers, if perhaps erring on the side of the polite. Which means that folks like you and me, honeybee, may need to err on the side of the impolite, or at least tread a little less delicately.
So, here’s a bit of impolite treading. Despite all his talk about spreading democracy, Bush, Cheney, et al revere a highly structured class-based society, of which they are the principals. They, the apparent aristocracy are the decision makers. They can do no wrong; even when their excesses become so blatant as in the current Snoopgate case, the system is gamed such that the aristocracy will be preserved. Vocal pundits, most if not all in debt to the current administration will come to their defense. Even the media entity we call “public television” will make this out to be a he-said/she-said case. ( Though, in all fairness, I’ve seen good stuff from PBS recently, and that should be acknowledged. For instance, reviewing Jim Lehr’s interview of Bush ten days ago, I thought he was, as they say “fair and balanced.”)
Let’s follow this line of impolite reasoning to its logical conclusion. If the state is run by the aristocracy, the role of the middle/working class becomes that of keeping the aristocracy in place. Which means that the worker bees need to be managed. If the middle/working class ever seriously objected to their place, then society could become unstable. There would be labor strikes, civil unrest, even rioting in the streets. The artistocratic class must ensure that never takes place.
That means that the middle class needs to be monitored. They must understand, that for their own protection, they can’t become critics of the state. And, if one does become a critic of the state, they need to be made a public example.
Extra credit: have you ever written a post, but then edited it down or deleted it for political reasons? If so, was that because you were afraid of the terrorists, or were you afraid of your own government?
[powered by WordPress.]
hip·po·pot·a·mus n. A notion, perhaps distinct from conventional wisdom, that needs to be verified by reality-based scrutiny.
95. Cogito cogito ergo cogito sum (I think that I think, therefore I think that I am.)
— Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
You can try Counter Culture coffees at: - Baked and Wired, 1052 Thomas Jefferson St. NW, 202-333-2500; www.bakedandwired.com [Link]
In sum, we concluded that the evidence showed that Goodling violated both federal law and Department policy, and therefore committed misconduct... [Link]
The best way to make sense of this legal tangle is to mouse over the title of an individual scandal, which will highlight everyone implicated. [Link]
A 22-year-old bicyclist was struck by a garbage truck and killed just north of Dupont Circle today, authorities said. Police and fire vehicles converged on the scene at 20th and R streets NW, snarling Connecticut Avenue traffic during the morning rush. [Link]
We're asking you to put some of the money you plan to give Obama "in escrow" until he demonstrates progressive leadership on the issues we care about, like warrantless wiretapping. [Link]
The report notes that the administration has gone to “unprecedented lengths to control and suppress information about the human cost” of the wars. [Link]
"We see a tipping point occurring right before our eyes," Hansen said during his appearance at the National Press Club. "The Arctic is the first tipping point and it's occurring exactly the way we said it would." [Link]
It appeared to confirm for the first time in an official examination many of the allegations from critics who charged that the Justice Department had become overly politicized during the Bush administration. [Link]
"After years of disclosures by government investigations, media accounts, and reports from human rights organizations, there is no longer any doubt as to whether the current administration has committed war crimes. The only question that remains to be ans [Link]
It gives me a terrible mental image of the whole country linking arms and goose-stepping in unison, with the politicians out in front doing a straight-armed salute. [Link]
BOULTON: There are those who would say look, lets take Guantanamo Bay, and Abu Ghraib, and rendition and all those things and to them that is the complete opposite of freedom. BUSH: Of course, if you want to slander America. [Link]
In a subsequent e-mail to the employee, Cargol described himself as “a rub-your-belly, grab-your-balls, give-you-a-hug, slap-your-back, pull-your-dick, squeeze-your-hand, cheek-your-face, and pat-your-thigh kind of guy.” [Link]
Democracy Now! Radio and TV News [Link]
Let's take a look at how the Los Angeles Times covered the new Senate Intelligence Committee report on the claims made as part of selling the Iraq war, and compare it to how the editorial page of the Washington Post, by which I mean Fred Hiatt, sees the e [Link]
Former White House press secretary Scott McClellan writes in a new memoir that the Iraq war was sold to the American people with a sophisticated "political propaganda campaign" led by President Bush and aimed at "manipulating sources of public opinion" an [Link]
27 queries. 0.709 seconds